Home / Politics / Donald Trump’s food stamp plan enrages liberals

Donald Trump’s food stamp plan enrages liberals

ANALYSIS/OPINION:

In his large funds proposal Monday, President Trump presented a singular concept: Instead of giving needy other folks stamps they are able to redeem for food, why now not simply give them exact food?

As it's possible you'll wager, liberals have been enraged by means of the perception. How dare Mr. Trump attempt to take food stamps clear of hungry other folks and provides them — of all issues — food?

Here’s how the liberal HuffPost noticed it: “Facing a trillion-dollar deficit as a result of his just-passed tax cuts, President Donald Trump has an concept for the right way to get a few of that cash again: making deficient other folks consume beans and rice.”

Oh, the humanity!

Currently, food stamps — identified formally because the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) — are supplied for some 42 million other folks, 80 % of whom get food vouchers each and every month price no less than $90 consistent with particular person. They may also be redeemed at many shops for food, however this system is rife with abuse.

For instance, an Oregon minimart proprietor used to be not too long ago sentenced to just about two years in the back of bars after being convicted for food stamp fraud totaling $189,000. In that case, prosecutors stated he overcharged food stamp recipients’ receive advantages playing cards after which gave them in money part of what he’d overcharged.

Under the Trump proposal, the ones 80 % of all SNAP recipients would get about part in their advantages within the type of a “USDA Foods package,” NPR reported. “The package was described in the budget as consisting of ‘shelf-stable milk, ready to eat cereals, pasta, peanut butter, beans and canned fruit and vegetables.’”

The program can be referred to as “America’s Harvest Box.” Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue referred to as it “a bold, innovative approach to providing nutritious food to people who need assistance feeding themselves and their families — and all of it is home-grown by American farmers and producers.”

Here’s the nut graf from the NPR tale: “The USDA believes that state governments will be able to deliver this food at much less cost than SNAP recipients currently pay for food at retail stores — thus reducing the overall cost of the SNAP program by $129 billion over the next 10 years. This and other changes in the SNAP program, according to the Trump administration, will reduce the SNAP budget by $213 billion over those years — cutting the program by almost 30 percent.”

Good plan, proper? Wrong, consistent with NPR.

“Joel Berg, CEO of Hunger Free America, a starvation advocacy workforce that still is helping shoppers get right of entry to food-assistance products and services, stated the management’s plan left him baffled. ‘They have managed to propose nearly the impossible, taking over $200 billion worth of food from low-income Americans while increasing bureaucracy and reducing choices,’ Berg says.

“He says SNAP is environment friendly as a result of this can be a ‘free market model’ that shall we recipients store at shops for his or her advantages. The Trump management’s proposal, he stated, ‘is a far more intrusive, Big Government answer. They think a bureaucrat in D.C. is better at picking out what your family needs than you are?’”

Well … Mr. Trump has succeeded in unexpectedly getting liberals to decry Big Brother and include the unfastened marketplace!

Amazing.

And a a ways cry from former President Barack Obama, who shall be remembered for using tens of millions to hunt assist from the federal government (as Democrats love). In 2009, when he took workplace, there have been 33.five million other folks on food stamp advantages; in October 2016, only some months prior to he left workplace, that quantity had skyrocketed to 44.2 million — a 32 % leap of just about 11 million other folks.

The value of this system to taxpayers rose from $50.three billion to $66.6 billion — all whilst the Obama management driven the concept that the financial system used to be booming (it wasn’t). As the unemployment fee dropped (basically because of Obama officers decreasing the selection of other folks thought to be within the “workforce”), tens of millions have been compelled onto food stamps.

But that “hope and change” has been changed by means of 4 easy phrases: “Make America Great Again.”

Statistics from the U.S. Department of Agriculture display just about 1.five million Americans have got off the food stamp rolls since Mr. Trump took workplace in January 2017, a three.five % drop in not up to a 12 months.

Still, liberals argue that Mr. Trump’s plan can be embarrassing for food stamp recipients, compelled to obtain unfastened food.

“Among the problems, it’s going to be costly and take money out of the [SNAP] program from the administrative side. It’s going to stigmatize people when they have to go to certain places to pick up benefits,” Jim Weill, president of the Food Research and Action Center, instructed NPR.

Well, there’s a strategy to trade that: Get a role and get off food stamps. There’s a “free market idea” for you.

Joseph Curl has lined politics for 25 years, together with 12 years as White House correspondent at The Washington Times. He may also be reached at [email protected] and on Twitter @josephcurl.

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting machine from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will wish to both create an account with Spot.im or if you want to use your Disqus account glance below the Conversation for the hyperlink "Have a Disqus Account?". Please learn our Comment Policy prior to commenting.

About Ali

Check Also

Conor Lamb, a Democratic candidate, warns against new gun laws

CARNEGIE, Pa. — Democrat Connor Lamb is conserving company in his trust that Congress doesn’t ...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

%d bloggers like this: