A Met reliable disputed that characterization. The reliable, who used to be granted anonymity to discuss an ongoing dispute, mentioned that whilst the chorister had indicated that he would settle for a written apology, he had additionally communicated to Met officers that he didn't need to see Mr. Copley both within the underground practice session rooms or on its degree, and threatened to seek the advice of a legal professional if he did.
Mr. Egert mentioned that whilst the chorister mentioned he didn't need to paintings with Mr. Copley within the practice session room, the union believes that he used to be — and nonetheless is — keen to paintings with Mr. Copley in degree rehearsals only if their interactions are “limited.”
William Guerri, Mr. Copley’s supervisor at Columbia Artists, declined to remark.
Union officers requested to meet with Mr. Gelb to talk about the location, and spot if Mr. Copley may go back.
After the Met brushed aside Mr. Copley, a respected director who has labored at main world opera properties, a heated debate erupted on social media about whether or not it used to be an overreaction.
A host of British critics — and buddies and admirers of Mr. Copley’s, together with singers who've labored with him — rushed to his protection, suggesting that any statement he had made should were supposed as a shaggy dog story, or misunderstood.
In taking the abnormal step of liberating a extra detailed commentary on Friday — making it transparent that the statement have been directed towards the chorister, and noting the misery that the episode brought about him — the Met appeared made up our minds to put the ones theories to leisure.
Mr. Copley’s dismissal got here because the Met investigates accusations of sexual misconduct towards its former tune director, James Levine. The Met suspended Mr. Levine in December after The New York Times reported the on-the-record accounts of 4 males who mentioned that he had sexually abused them a long time in the past, after they have been youngsters or his scholars. Mr. Levine has denied the accusations. But the episode left some wondering what the Met knew about Mr. Levine’s suspected conduct, for the reason that rumors about his personal lifestyles had circulated for a long time.
Faced with a criticism towards Mr. Copley, although, the corporate acted all of a sudden. “The Met has strong policies in place relating to workplace behavior and puts paramount importance on the welfare of its artists and staff,” it mentioned within the commentary.
Mr. Copley, the former main resident director on the Royal Opera House in London, has created a bunch of enduring productions for main opera corporations world wide. He has come to the Met to remount his 1990 manufacturing of Rossini’s “Semiramide,” which is one thing of a rarity. A host of his different productions were observed on the Met, together with stagings of Bellini’s “Norma” and “Il Pirata,” Handel’s “Giulio Cesare” and Donizetti’s “L’Elisir d’Amore.”